Steve Moreno's L-Neat

All samples indicated in this test were wheat. Formation samples were taken from the smallest upper S.E. circle as indicated in the diagram. All controls were taken directly due East of that circle. All samples were collected on July 1st 2003.

These samples were measured with a micrometer up to .01 accuracy. The measurement process done so each sample was imaged while being measured. Each image shows the micrometer lined up on the node with the digital readout displaying the measurement of the labeled sample.

Samples were labeled in alphabetical order with no indication on the tags if they were controls or formations. This was to facilitate a single blind test to verify any significant findings.

Test were conducted initially with 23 single samples per formation and control areas. Then test were done increasing the controls by an additional 16 single samples to see how strengthening the controls representation of 'normal' affected the prior results.

This data represents a 30% difference in longer node lengths of the formation over the control areas taken 300'-500' directly East of the small S.E. circle indicated in the diagram above. 30% is considered significant enough to allow for an acceptable margin of error of up to 10%, still remaining within the upper range of the 20% level considered as significant. The probability of this occurring as a matter of chance is p0.0001 or 1 in 10,000, an excellent result well below the p0.05 minimum considered significant.

Upon the request of Dr. Aubrun I increased the sampling of the Control area by 16 single samples. This strengthens the Control areas representation of what a normal node length should be, increasing the validity of the resulting difference.

In this particular case the 30% positive effect, indicated by an equal sampling of 23 in both areas in Chart A, is strengthened to 37% difference for the formations over the controls, with the probability factor remaining at p0.0001. This increases the validity of the positive results obtained, as the formation's difference increases by 7%, even though the control sampling increases by 70%.

Upon suggestion from Dr. Lietzau we employed a single blind test by having Ruben Uriarte measure all samples with the same micrometer instrument and having each measure imaged as before. In this case however Ruben would not know which samples were formation and which were controls.

The results from this test indicate a 22% difference in favor of the formation, with a probability factor of p0.0005, all still remaining quite significant.

According to the standards established by and setup through the L-NEAT Process, R1 is scientifically significant in the effects that have occurred to the nodes within the formation area. Rockville 1 is L-NEAT Positive.

Measurements made independently by a second investigator, following a blind experiment protocol also demonstrates a significant difference, verifying the presence of a statistically conclusive pattern.

_________________________________________________________________________________

Every measure was imaged as shown, including within the image's frame, the calipers lined up on the nodes landmarks, the instruments digital display readout, and the sample's label. These images are available upon request.